ISO/TC 265/WG5 N 133
Date: 2025-12-23
ISO/DIS27917:2026(en)
Secretariat: SCC
Carbon dioxide capture, transportation and storage —
Vocabulary — Cross-cutting terms
Captage, transport et stockage du dioxyde de carbone — Vocabulaire — Termes transverses
© ISO 2026
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO's member body in the country of the requester.
ISO Copyright Office
CP 401 • CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: + 41 22 749 01 11
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland.
Contents
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 265, Carbon dioxide capture, transportation and storage.
Introduction
The objectives of the document are the following:
— to provide a comprehensive list of terms and their definitions for carbon dioxide capture, transportation and geological storage including through enhanced oil (or gas) recovery (EOR) operation to facilitate communication among:
— experts involved in the development of ISO standards on carbon dioxide capture, transportation and geological storage;
— other carbon dioxide capture, transportation and geological storage stakeholders;
— to provide the basis for common understanding for all future ISO TC 265 documents for carbon dioxide capture, transportation and storage.
The term “sequestration” has been used by some countries and organizations instead of “storage” (e.g. the international “Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum”). The two terms are considered synonymous, and only “storage” is used in this document.
The chemical symbol “CO2” is synonymous with “carbon dioxide”. Accordingly, the two ways of writing out “carbon dioxide” and “CO2” are used interchangeably in this document.
Carbon dioxide capture, transportation and storage — Vocabulary — Cross-cutting terms
1.0 Scope
This document defines a list of cross-cutting terms commonly used in the field of carbon dioxide capture, transportation and geological sub-surface storage including through storage in association with enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations.
This document only deals with CO2 geological sub-surface storage.
The terms are classified as follows:
— general terms and definitions relating to carbon dioxide;
— general terms and definitions relating to carbon dioxide capture, transportation and storage;
— general terms and definitions relating to monitoring and measuring performance in carbon dioxide capture, transportation and geological storage;
— general terms and definitions relating to risk;
— general terms and definitions relating to relationships with stakeholders;
A list of the main acronyms used is given in Annex A.
2.0 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3.0 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
3.1 General terms and definitions relating to carbon dioxide capture, transportation and storage
3.1.1
carbon dioxide capture and geological storage
CCS
process consisting of the separation of CO2 from the atmosphere or from industrial and energy-related sources, transportation and injection into a geological formation, resulting in long term isolation from the atmosphere
Note 1 to entry: CCS is often referred to as Carbon Capture and Storage. This terminology is not encouraged because it is inaccurate: the objective is the capture of carbon dioxide and not the capture of carbon. Tree plantation is another form of carbon capture that does not describe precisely the physical process of removing CO2 from industrial emission sources.
Note 2 to entry: The term "sequestration" is also used alternatively to "storage". The term "storage" is preferred since “sequestration” is more generic and can also refer to biological processes (absorption of carbon by living organisms).
Note 3 to entry: Long term means the minimum period necessary for geological storage of CO2 to be considered an effective and environmentally safe climate change mitigation option.
Note 4 to entry: The term Carbon dioxide Capture, Utilization (or use) and Storage (CCUS) includes the concept that isolation from the atmosphere could be associated with a beneficial outcome. CCUS is embodied within the definition of CCS to the extent that long term isolation of the CO2 occurs through storage within geological formations. CCU is Carbon Capture and Utilization (or use) without storage within geological formations.
Note 5 to entry: CCS should also ensure long term isolation of CO2 from oceans, lakes, potable water supplies and other natural resources.
3.1.2
CCS project life cycle
entirety of phases of a CCS project from concept through to post-closure
Note 1 to entry: The CCS project life cycle includes mainly concept, design, obtaining permit, construction, operation, monitoring, measurement and verification, decommissioning, closure and post-closure (see Annex C).
3.1.3
intermittency
lack of continuity in operation, as measured by the frequency or extent to which a process or installation is stopped or unavailable
Note 1 to entry: Intermittency includes variable CO2 flows among project components.
3.1.4
geological storage complex
subsurface geological strata that comprise the storage unit (3.1.2) and the confining unit (3.1.19), and extending laterally to the defined limits of the CO2 storage site
Note 1 to entry: Limits can be defined by natural geological boundaries, regulation or legal rights.
3.1.5
EOR Complex
project reservoir, trap, and such additional surrounding volume in the subsurface as defined by the operator within which injected CO2 will remain in safe, long-term containment (3.1.6)
3.1.6
safe, long-term containment
for the period necessary to be considered secure by the system under which the quantification is being implemented
3.1.7
geological storage
safe, long-term containment (3.1.6) of CO2 stream in subsurface geological formations
[SOURCE: ISO 27914:2026, 3.14]
3.1.8
carbon dioxide (CO2) plume
region within geologic strata where CO2 is present in free phase
Note 1 to entry: In saline aquifers, CO2 as a free phase includes typically CO2 as a separate buoyant fluid phase. It may also include CO2 dissolved in formation water.
Note 2 to entry: In depleted natural gas reservoirs, a CO2 plume may be a part of a porous reservoir with CO2 concentrations in the gas phase, exceeding initial concentrations in the reservoir
Note 3 to entry: In environmental impact assessments and risk management, the term CO2 plume can also refer to an area or volume in the atmosphere or in aquatic environments into which CO2 is dispersed or dissolved
[SOURCE: ISO 27914:2026, 3.4 Notes added]
3.1.9
carbon dioxide capture and geological storage project
CCS project
consists of one or more connected CO2 capture systems, transportation systems, and storage or geological storage systems
Note 1 to entry: Each system (capture, transportation, or storage) might be operated by independent operators.
Note 2 to entry: The term “integrated CCS project” is sometimes used to identify a project that includes capturing CO2 from a point source or the atmosphere, transporting it to storage or a geological storage site where it is injected into deep geologic formations (storage complex), and monitoring (3.3.1) to verify that it remains isolated from the atmosphere.
Note 3 to entry: For more information on
— CO2 capture systems, see ISO/TR 27912,
— CO2 transportation systems, see ISO 27913, and
— CO2 geological storage systems, see ISO 27914.
[SOURCE: ISO 27914:2017, 3.56]
3.1.10
CO2 capture
separation of CO2 in such a manner as to produce a concentrated stream of CO2 that can readily be transported for storage
[SOURCE: ISO TR 27912;2016, 3.16]
3.1.11
carbon dioxide capture and storage network
CCS network
connections of multiple CO2 sources and storage sites
[SOURCE: ISO TR 27925;2023 3.1]
3.1.12
carbon dioxide capture and storage system
CCS system
combination of the capture, transportation and storage components considered as a single entity
[SOURCE: ISO TR 27925;2023 3.3]
3.1.13
flow assurance
engineering discipline that is required to understand the behavior of fluids inside pipelines, at flowing and static conditions
Note 1 to entry: The flow assurance provides input to design activities, such as pipeline design or risk analysis and operating philosophy development.
[SOURCE: ISO 27913;2024 3.13]
3.1.14
hydraulic capacity
maximum flow rate achievable in a system for a given pressure loss and given mechanical and operating constraints
[SOURCE: ISO 27913;2024 3.15]
3.1.15
CCS project component
assemblage of technical or geotechnical installations and natural features of subsurface geological systems that are separate in terms of physical space, technical disciplines, industrial practice and dominating physico-chemical processes
3.1.16
chemical component or constituent
individual molecular parts of a fluid or stream
3.1.17
CO2 carrier
cargo ship or barge constructed or adapted and used for the carriage of CO2 as cargo
[SOURCE: ISO TR 27929;2024 3.4]
3.1.18
intermediate storage
storage of CO2 volumes before being loaded to a ship and storage after being offloaded from a ship
[SOURCE: ISO TR 27929;2024 3.13]
3.1.19
confining unit
geological strata that are part of a geological storage complex (3.1.4) and effectively restrict migration of fluids out of the storage unit (3.1.20) and leakage (3.2.14) out of the geological storage complex
Note 1 to entry: Described in reservoir engineering as caprock and in hydrogeology as aquitard or aquiclude.
3.1.20
storage unit
geological stratum (or strata) into which CO2 is injected and contained for the purpose of geological storage
[SOURCE: ISO 27914:2026, 3.50]
3.1.1 General terms and definitions relating to CO2
3.2.1
supercritical CO2
CO2 at pressures and temperatures above both the critical pressure and critical temperature
3.2.2
dense phase CO2
CO2 or CO2 stream (3.2.11) in the single-phase fluid state above a density of 500 kg/m3
Note 1 to entry: For more details on the dense phase, refer to ISO/TR 27925:2023.
[SOURCE: ISO 27913;2024 3.9 added CO2]
Note 2 to entry: Compression and transport of dense phase CO2 are commonly achieved using pumps. Compression and transport at lower densities are commonly achieved with turbo-compressors.
Note 3 to entry: Not all supercritical CO2 is in a dense phase, and not all dense phase CO2 is supercritical.
Note 4 to entry: Figure 1 illustrates pure CO2 phase diagram and density plots, calculated according to Reference [16], and plotted as a function of temperature and pressure.
Key
1 triple point
2 critical point
3 liquid-gas phase boundary
4 solid-(dense) fluid phase boundary
5 solid-(gaseous) fluid phase boundary
6 critical temperature
7 critical pressure
8 lower operation limit for radial pumps
Figure 1 — Pure CO2 phase diagram and density plots
Note 5 to entry: The curve defined by Key number 8 is shown as an example illustrating typical operation limits specific to individual pumps, according to Reference [17].
— Fluid CO2 in the p-T-range between lines 3, 4 and 6 is often named liquid CO2.
— Fluid CO2 in the p-T-range between lines 3, 5 and 7 is often named gaseous CO2.
— Fluid CO2 in the p-T-range between lines 6 and 7 is often named supercritical CO2.
— Solid CO2 in the p-T-range between lines 4 and 5 is often named dry ice.
— Fluid CO2 in the p-T-range above lines 3 and 8 is often named dense phase CO2.
Note 6 to entry: In thermodynamic equilibrium, liquid and gaseous CO2 do only coexist at p-T-values specified by line 3 between points 1 and 2.
3.2.3
single phase
flow of CO2 or a CO2 stream (3.2.1) in a gas or a dense phase CO2 (3.2.2), but not in any combination of them
[SOURCE: ISO 27913;2024 3.28]
3.2.4
bubble point pressure
pressure of the saturated liquid at a given composition and temperature
[SOURCE: ISO 27913;2024 3.3]
3.2.5
dew point pressure
pressure on the saturated vapour line
[SOURCE: ISO 27913;2024 3.10]
3.2.6
minimum design temperature
lowest possible temperature to which the equipment or system may reasonably be exposed locally during installation and operation
[SOURCE: ISO 27913;2024 3.19]
3.2.7
operating envelope
limited range of parameters over which operations result in safe and acceptable performance of the equipment or system
[SOURCE: ISO 27913;2024 3.22]
3.2.8
global warming potential
GWP
factor describing the radiative forcing impact of one mass-based unit of a given greenhouse gas relative to an equivalent unit of carbon dioxide over a specified period of time
3.2.9
CO2 emission reduction
quantified decrease in CO2 emissions between a baseline scenario and the CCS project output
Note 1 to entry: In most cases, a CO2 emission reduction may be referred to as “CO2 avoided”. CO2 avoided may also refer to CO2 removals from the atmosphere.
[SOURCE: ISO 14064‑2:2019, 3.1.7 modified — “greenhouse gas” and “GHG” have been replaced by “CO2” in the term and the definition “project“ has been replaced by “CCS project output”.]
3.2.10
abatement
reduction in the amount, degree or intensity of emissions of CO2 or other pollutants
[SOURCE: IPCC:2005 modified]
3.2.11
CO2 stream
stream in CCS projects consisting overwhelmingly of carbon dioxide
Note 1 to entry: the CO2 stream (typically > 95 mol% CO2) often includes impurities and could include substances added to the stream to improve performance of CCS and/or to enable CO2 detection.
Note 2 to entry: the properties of a CO2 stream will differ significantly from those of pure CO2 depending on the composition of the CO2 stream.
3.2.12
CO2 stream composition
percentage by volume of each component of the CO2 stream (3.2.11)
Note 1 to entry: The CO2 stream composition is usually subject to regulatory discretion and approval. It is less common to report stream composition as a mass fraction.
Note 2 to entry: The term CO2 purity may be used to indicate the percentage (volume, mass or mol) by volume of CO2 as a (major) component of the CO2 stream, e.g. a CO2 purity of 95 % (as in 3.2.11). A purity definition could also include specific limitations on contents, fractions or concentrations of individual impurities.
3.2.13
impurities
non-CO2 substances that are part of the CO2 stream (3.2.11) that may be derived from the source materials or the capture process, added through commingling for transportation added to enable or improve the injection process, enhance hydrocarbon recovery, or assist in CO2 detection, or formed as a result of sub-surface storage
3.2.14
CO2 leakage
unintended release of CO2 out of a pre-defined containment
Note 1 to entry: Containments can include both surface containers (e.g. compressors, pipelines, trucks, ships, trains) and subsurface containments (e.g. geological storage complex).
3.2.15
CO2 migration
movement of CO2 within the geological storage complex (3.1.4)
3.2.16
anthropogenic carbon dioxide
carbon dioxide that is initially produced as a by-product of a combustion, chemical, or separation process (including separation of hydrocarbon-bearing fluids or gases)
3.2.17
geological containment
retention of CO2 streams and formation fluids within a geological storage complex (3.1.4) or an EOR complex (3.1.5)
3.1.2 General terms and definitions relating to monitoring and measuring performance in CCS
3.3.1
monitoring
continuous or repeated checking, supervising, critically observing, measuring or determining the status of a system to identify change from a baseline or variance from an expected performance level
Note 1 to entry: In case of geological storage, monitoring is not restricted to the technical infrastructure of an operator, it also includes the wider surroundings of the surface or subsurface storage site.
3.3.2
baseline
reference basis for comparison against which project status or performance is monitored or measured
3.3.3
detection threshold
smallest value of a property of a substance or effect that can be reliably detected by a specific method of measurement in a specified context
Note 1 to entry: The term detection limit is used sometimes as a synonym to detection threshold.
[SOURCE: ISO 27914:2026, 3.11]
3.3.4
area of review
AOR
geographical area(s) of a CCS project or part of it, designated for assessment of the extent to which a CCS project, or part of it, could affect life and human health, the environment, competitive development of other resources, or infrastructure
Note 1 to entry: The delineation of an area of review defines the outer perimeters on the land surface or seabed and water surface within which assessments will be conducted.
3.3.5
maximum allowable operating pressure
MAOP
highest possible pressure to which the equipment or system may reasonably be exposed locally during operation
[SOURCE: ISO 27913;2024 3.18]
3.1.3 General terms and definitions relating to risk
NOTE Some definitions in this clause relating to risk have been adapted from ISO Guide 73 and from CSA Z 741 for the context of CCS.
3.4.1
risk
effect of uncertainty on project objectives (e.g. on performance metrics for an element of concern)
Note 1 to entry: An effect is a deviation from the expected — positive and/or negative.
Note 2 to entry: Objectives can have different aspects (such as financial, health and safety, and environmental goals) and can apply at different levels (such as strategic, organization-wide, project, product and process).
Note 3 to entry: Risk is expressed in terms of a combination of the severity of consequences (negative impacts) of an event and the associated likelihood of their occurrence.
[SOURCE: ISO Guide 73:2009, 1.1 modified — “(e.g. on performance metrics for an element of concern)” has been added. Note 4 to entry has been deleted and Note 3 to entry modified.]
3.4.2
overarching risk
risk that affects a CCS project as a whole or CCS projects in general
3.4.3
cross-cutting risk
risk that affects one or more part(s) of a CCS project and has an impact or effect on other parts
3.4.4
risk assessment
process of identifying, analyzing and evaluating risk scenarios (3.4.8)
3.4.5
risk evaluation criteria
terms of reference used to define the magnitude of risk (3.4.1)
3.4.6
risk treatment
process of using risk control (3.4.7) to reduce a specified risk (3.4.1)
3.4.7
risk control
measure whose purpose is to reduce a specific risk (3.4.1) or avoid escalation of risk
3.4.8
risk scenario
combination or chain of circumstances through which a threat can cause an event to occur and through which the consequences of an event can have a negative impact on elements of concern
3.4.9
acceptable risk
risk borne by the project operator and others having regard to legal obligations and management policies
Note 1 to entry: A tolerable risk is a risk of significant level considered as temporarily or conditionally acceptable. It is tolerated to facilitate a gradual response (e.g. monitoring of risk treatment) until the risk has been reduced.
[SOURCE: ISO 27914:2017, 3.2]
3.4.10
unacceptable risk
risk of a nature and level that is regarded as unacceptable by the project operator and others or by an authority whose approval is required for the project to proceed
3.4.11
preventive measures
measures that aim to reduce the likelihood that a specific event occurs
Note 1 to entry: These measures are thus implemented before a hazardous event has occurred or before a process has led to unwanted impacts (e.g. exceeded predefined thresholds)
3.4.12
mitigation
limitation or reduction of actual or potential undesirable effects of a particular event or process
3.4.13
remediation
process of correcting a failure or impacts on affected elements of concern
3.4.14
emergency response plan
systematic procedures that clearly detail what is to be done, how, when, and by whom before, during and after the time an emergency occurs
Note 1 to entry: In some jurisdictions, it can be called “emergency and remedial response plan”, “contingency plan”, etc.
Note 2 to entry: Emergency response plans often also cite preparations to be completed before an emergency occurs
3.4.15
environmental impact
change, which may be adverse or beneficial, to the environment, wholly or partially resulting from CCS project activities
3.4.16
expert elicitation
structured process for obtaining expert opinion
Note 1 to entry: Structured discussions, interviews, questionnaires, and polling or voting are among the methods used for expert elicitation.
Note 2 to entry: Expert opinions may be needed to assess quantities, consequences, probabilities, etc.
3.4.17
elements of concern
valued elements or objectives for which risk is evaluated and managed
3.1.4 General terms and definitions relating to relationship with stakeholders
3.5.1
stakeholder
individual, group of individuals, or organization whose interests are or could be affected by a CCS project
3.5.2
operator
person or entity legally responsible for all or part of a CCS project operations
3.5.3
regulator
entity that has the authority to permit, approve, or otherwise authorize one or more CCS project activities, or monitor compliance with the terms of a permit, approval, or authorization
[SOURCE: CSA Z741-12 modified]
3.5.4
communication plan
document describing when, what and how to communicate with project stakeholders
Note 1 to entry: A communication plan may provide information relating to issues such as monitoring and verification, environmental impacts, risk treatment.
3.5.5
stakeholder engagement
consultation process that involves stakeholders identifying and addressing issues of common importance and sharing information on CCS projects
3.5.6
third party
entity that is independent of the parties involved with the issues in question
(Informative)
General Definitions
A.1
life cycle assessment
LCA
compilation and evaluation of the inputs, outputs and the potential environmental and health impacts of a CCS project or a component part throughout its life cycle
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, 3.2 modified — “and health” and “a CCS project or a component part” have been added and “of a product system” has been deleted. The Note 1 to entry has been added.]
Note 1 to entry: Boundaries of the assessment include all equipment and processes necessary to evaluate a CCS project or component part. The main input and output flows may include raw materials, process gases, electricity, fossil fuels, water, CO2, emission in air and water, solid and liquid waste, co-products, etc.
A.2
value chain
entire sequence of activities or parties that provide or receive value in the form of products or services
[SOURCE: ISO 26000:2010, 2.25]
A.3
critical point
highest temperature and pressure at which a pure substance (e.g. CO2) can exist as a gas and a liquid in equilibrium
Note 1 to entry: For a multicomponent fluid mixture of a given composition, the critical point is the intersection of the bubble curve and the dew point curve.
Note 2 to entry: The critical point can be established with the critical pressure (A.5) and the critical temperature (A.6).
Reference: 'critical point' in IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 5th ed. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry; 2025. Online version 5.0.0, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook.C01396
A.4
triple point
temperature and pressure at which the three phases (gas, liquid and solid) of a substance coexist in thermodynamic equilibrium
[SOURCE: ISO 27913;2024 3.30]
A.5
critical pressure
vapour pressure at the critical temperature
Note 1 to entry: According to Reference [16], the critical pressure for pure CO2 is expressed in absolute pressure as 7,377 3 MPa.
Reference: 'critical pressure' in IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 5th ed. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry; 2025. Online version 5.0.0, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook.C01397
A.6
critical temperature
temperature above which liquid cannot be formed simply by increasing the pressure
Note 1 to entry: According to Reference [16], the critical temperature for pure CO2 is 304,1282 K.
Note 2 to entry: For CO2 streams (3.2.11), phase transitions can still occur above critical temperature.
Reference: 'critical temperature' in IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 5th ed. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry; 2025. Online version 5.0.0, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook.C01402
A.7
CO2 equivalent
unit for comparing the radiative forcing of a GHG to that of carbon dioxide
Note 1 to entry: The carbon dioxide equivalent is calculated using the mass of a given GHG multiplied by its global warming potential.
[SOURCE: ISO 14064‑2:2019, 3.1.15 – modified to add Note 1.]
A.8
multi-phase flow
co-existence of more than one fluid phases (e.g. gas and dense phases or two dense phases) in the same location of the pipeline
[SOURCE: ISO 27913;2024 3.20]
A.9
non-condensable component
chemical that, when pure, can be in gaseous form at possible CO2 equilibrium conditions throughout the CO2 value chain
Note 1 to entry: This results in an increase of the bubble point pressure of a CO2 stream containing this component. Examples include N2, Ar, CH4, O2, H2, CO (excluding CO2).
[SOURCE: ISO 27913;2024 3.21]
A.10
greenhouse gas
GHG
gaseous constituent of the atmosphere, both natural and anthropogenic, that absorbs and emits radiation at specific wavelengths within the spectrum of infrared radiation emitted by the Earth's surface, the atmosphere, and clouds
Note 1 to entry: The most common greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6). Emissions from these gases are reported under the UNFCCC and aggregated into carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) using factors called global warming potentials (GWPs). For a list of GHGs, see the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Report.
Note 2 to entry: Water vapour and ozone are anthropogenic as well as natural GHGs, but are not included as recognized GHGs due to difficulties, in most cases, in isolating the human-induced component of global warming attributable to their presence in the atmosphere.
[SOURCE: ISO 14064-2:2019, 3.1.1 modified – Notes 1 and 2 combined and edited – Note 2 added here]
(informative)
List of acronyms
CCS | Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geological Storage |
CCU | Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization (or use) |
CCUS | Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization (or use) and Storage |
EOR | Enhanced Oil Recovery |
GHG | Greenhouse Gases |
GWP | Global Warming Potential |
IPCC | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change |
LCA | Life Cycle Assessment |
(informative)
CCS project life cycle
Figure C.1 — CCS project life cycle[1]
Bibliography
[1] ISO 14040:2006, Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework
[2] ISO 14064‑1:2018, Greenhouse gases — Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals
[3] ISO 14064‑2:2019, Greenhouse gases — Part 2: Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal enhancements
[4] ISO 14064‑3:2019, Greenhouse gases — Part 3: Specification with guidance for the verification and validation of greenhouse gas statements
[5] ISO 17000:2020, Conformity assessment — Vocabulary and general principles
[6] ISO 26000:2010, Guidance on social responsibility
[7] ISO 27914:2017, Carbon dioxide capture, transportation and geological storage — Geological storage
[8] ISO/TR 27918:2018, Lifecycle risk management for integrated CCS projects
[9] ISO Guide 73:2009, Risk management — Vocabulary
[10] IEAGHG Report 2009/TR7 Review of the International State of the Art in Risk Assessment Guidelines and Proposed Terminology for Use in CO2 Geological Storage
[11] IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Chapter 5. Carbon Dioxide Transport, Injection and Geological Storage, 2006
[12] IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, 2005
[13] CSA Z741:12 (R2022) Geological storage of carbon dioxide
[14] DNV 2009-1425
[15] DNV-RP-J203
[16] Span R., Wagner W. A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple point temperature to 1100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 1996, 25 pp. 1509–1596
[17] Schwarz and Ruf, in Fischedick et al. eds. (2015) CO2: Abtrennung, Speicherung, Nutzung. Chapter 8.4.2 CO2 Verdichtung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 855 p.
From ISO/TR 27918. ↑
